Argument Dialectics: The Place of Reasons in Logic
暫譯: 論辯辯證法：理性在邏輯中的地位

Marraud, Hubert

Argument Dialectics: The Place of Reasons in Logic
  • 出版商: Springer
  • 出版日期: 2025-06-13
  • 售價: $6,680
  • 貴賓價: 9.5 折 $6,346
  • 語言: 英文
  • 頁數: 246
  • 裝訂: Hardcover - also called cloth, retail trade, or trade
  • ISBN: 3031929896
  • ISBN-13: 9783031929892
  • 相關分類: Computer-Science

    • 海外代購書籍(需單獨結帳)

相關主題

商品描述

This book is a systematic exposition of Argument Dialectics (AD). Despite its name, argument dialectics is a logical approach to argumentation theory. AD stands out among theories of argument because of three unusual features: it is reasons-based, holistic and particularistic. This implies that AD conceives of logic as a theory of the dialectical construction of reasons, not as a theory of inferences. Consequently, contrary to other logical approaches, AD focuses on the study of inter-argumentative relations, especially those of opposition and weighing. The book makes an extensive use of the theory of reasons, a branch of metaethics that has been a very valuable quarry of intuitions and concepts for the elaboration of a reason-based theory of argument. The oppositions generalism-particularism and atomism-holism, proposed by Jonathan Dancy, which play a central role in the book and in the development of AD, have been adapted from the theory of reasons, and the same can be said of the distinction between different statuses of reasons that AD associates with different kinds of counterarguments. Conceiving of the theory of argument in terms of reasons has the effect of situating the paradigm of argumentation in practical argumentation/reasoning "about what to do" rather than in theoretical argumentation "about what to believe", as inference-based theories do. Hence, this book is of interest to argumentation theorists, communication theorists, epistemologists, linguists, moral philosophers, and philosophers of law.

商品描述(中文翻譯)

這本書系統性地闡述了論證辯證法（Argument Dialectics, AD）。儘管名稱如此，論證辯證法是一種邏輯的論證理論方法。AD 在論證理論中脫穎而出，因為它具有三個不尋常的特徵：基於理由、整體性和特定性。這意味著 AD 將邏輯視為理由的辯證建構理論，而非推理理論。因此，與其他邏輯方法相反，AD 專注於研究論證之間的關係，特別是對立和權衡的關係。本書廣泛使用理由理論，這是一個元倫理學的分支，為基於理由的論證理論的發展提供了非常有價值的直覺和概念。由 Jonathan Dancy 提出的對立概念：一般主義-特定主義和原子論-整體論，在本書及 AD 的發展中扮演了核心角色，這些概念已從理由理論中進行了調整，AD 與不同類型的反駁相關聯的理由不同狀態的區分也是如此。將論證理論視為基於理由的理論，將論證的範式置於實踐論證/推理「關於該做什麼」的情境中，而非推理基礎理論「關於該相信什麼」，因此本書對論證理論家、傳播理論家、認識論者、語言學家、道德哲學家和法律哲學家都具有興趣。

作者簡介

I teach argumentation theory at the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. My conception of argumentation theory and its development is presented in books such as Methodus argumentandi (2007), Es lógic (2013), En buena lógica (2020), and How Philosophers Argue (Argumentation Library, 14, 2022), Part II, and in half a hundred articles published in journals such as Argumentation, Informal Logic, Theoria, Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación, etc.

My theoretical proposal is known as "argument dialectics". Argument dialectics is a theory of argument (or logic) based on reasons and not on inferences, holistic and not atomistic, and particularistic and not generalistic. It is a logic based on reasons, because it understands argument as the presentation of something to someone for consideration as a reason for something else. Reasons, unlike conclusions, are weightable, and consequently the dialectic of arguments places weighting and counter-weighting at the center of argumentative practices. The dialectic of arguments is holistic because it maintains that the logical properties of arguments depend on contextual factors, and therefore the conclusion is primarily the conclusion of a multilinear network or composition of arguments, not the conclusion of an isolated argument. The logical tradition is atomistic and maintains that, on the contrary, the logical properties of arguments depend solely on the relation between their premises and their conclusion, and thus do not depend on context. Finally, argument dialectics is particularistic, because it defends that one can distinguish between good and bad arguments logico sensu without resorting to general principles or rules, in contrast to the generalist tradition, which defends the opposite.

作者簡介(中文翻譯)

我在馬德里自治大學教授論證理論。我的論證理論及其發展的概念在《Methodus argumentandi》（2007年）、《Es lógic》（2013年）、《En buena lógica》（2020年）以及《How Philosophers Argue》（Argumentation Library, 14, 2022年）第二部分等書籍中有所呈現，並在《Argumentation》、《Informal Logic》、《Theoria》、《Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación》等期刊上發表了五十多篇文章。

我的理論提案被稱為「論證辯證法」（argument dialectics）。論證辯證法是一種基於理由而非推論的論證（或邏輯）理論，具有整體性而非原子性，並且是特定性而非一般性。它是一種基於理由的邏輯，因為它將論證理解為向某人呈現某事，以作為其他事物的理由。理由與結論不同，是可以加權的，因此論證的辯證法將加權和反加權置於論證實踐的中心。論證的辯證法是整體性的，因為它認為論證的邏輯特性依賴於情境因素，因此結論主要是多線性網絡或論證組合的結論，而不是孤立論證的結論。邏輯傳統是原子性的，並認為相反地，論證的邏輯特性僅依賴於其前提與結論之間的關係，因此不依賴於情境。最後，論證辯證法是特定性的，因為它主張可以在不訴諸一般原則或規則的情況下區分良好與不良的論證，這與主張相反的一般主義傳統形成對比。

類似商品